this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
336 points (96.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43855 readers
1676 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it is Cellular Automata, and more precisely the Game of Life.

Imagine a giant Excel spreadsheet where the cells are randomly chosen to be either "alive" or "dead". Each cell then follows a handful of simple rules.

For example, if a cell is "alive" but has less than 2 "alive" neighbors it "dies" by under-population. If the cell is "alive" and has more than three "alive" neighbors it "dies" from over-population, etc.

Then you sit back and just watch things play out. It turns out that these basic rules at the individual level lead to incredibly complex behaviors at the community level when you zoom out.

It kinda, sorta, maybe resembles... life.

There is colonization, reproduction, evolution, and sometimes even space flight!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still refuse to believe that we can't overcome the limit of the speed of light. Maybe it's something like "warpspeed", maybe it's something like evolving beyond the need for a physical body, but I believe that at some (far) point in our future we will solve that problem.

[–] yunggwailo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Speed of light is a bit of a misnomer, its really the speed of causality; the least amount of time it can take for one thing to interact with another. It will never be possible to overcome that limit unfortunately

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, it’s impossible with our current understanding of the nature of the universe and it’s rules. Every time that has been true of something, humanity has eventually either solved the problem or rendered it moot. This one may just take a while.

[–] yunggwailo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Respectfully disagree. The math speaks for itself

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] yunggwailo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Its shortsighted to trust math?

[–] AmbientChaos@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You should look into the effects on causality of going faster than the speed of light. If you can send information faster than the speed of light all kinds of wacky paradoxes show their heads. I used to believe what you did, that with time and knowledge we could overcome the speed of light. But after learning more about our universe I don't think that's the case anymore. I enjoyed this video on the topic https://youtu.be/an0M-wcHw5A