this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
59 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

34448 readers
308 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 31 points 4 months ago (5 children)

When Elon Musk tortures monkeys to death with brain chips it's innovation, but when China does it it's "controversial" and "concerning"

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

NGL I think it should all brain chips should fall under "concerning" and "controversial"

The artificial eyes that existed in the past come to mind.

For those unfamiliar, when the companies that made them went under support for the devices vanished and the people who got them were left with broken and defunct hardware still stuck in their heads

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bionics require right to repair and open sourced software.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

If only the people doing these stuff cared...

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I beleive companies making medical hardware should be forced to open source the firmware and software as well as document how the hardware works and have it be open to the public in a read only mode while qualified people can make updates to the software and firmware

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That requires a functional Congress, which is really only achieved by getting rid of the GOP disease in all three branches.

[–] deFrisselle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, a One Party Dictatorship would solve everything

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Well, another party that is willing to actually govern is welcome to stand up for itself and replace the GOP.

Until that happens, we have the GOP, a party that is ran by gaslighting, obstructionism, and projection, who's real purpose has been laid bare for decades: To take our government, and "reduce it to the size where [they] can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub". And the Democrats, a party that has its own flaws, but actually wants to enact laws and run the country.

One of these parties wants to actively destroy our government, and one of them doesn't.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago

When Musk does anything it’s controversial and concerning.

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

parenti quote parenti quote

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh shut up most people shit all over musk

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Most people in our social circles. Trust me, I spoke with random people about Musk and his brain chips and they thought he was a genius. Elon's tech is years behind the research he stole the ideas from.