this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
95 points (92.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
3749 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)

This isn't about last mile trucking though, this is about long-haul trucking.

That said, considering trains are getting longer and longer and with fewer and fewer employees on board, I'm not sure that even more freight by rail is a good solution either.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The rail industry would be much better off being better regulated and with large rail companies broken up.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Definitely, but even then, we have a huge amount of freight going on our railroads. I live in a town that's a major cross-point for multiple railroads. Traffic is held up constantly by super long trains going through. Kids are late for school, people are late for work, people miss doctor's appointments and, worse, ambulances have to take circuitous routes to the couple of overpasses they can use to get around them. And then there are the times where a train breaks down just outside of town and cuts off one side of town from the other for hours except for those two overpasses.

I don't know what the solution is there.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The issue is with how we prioritize rail. When grade crossings are installed, they are the least path of resistance, but also are the biggest obstacle in planning. If we really want to see better rail, we need to pay for the infrastructure (ie, elevated crossings). That’s not to say every route needs the best infrastructure, but at least the busiest.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

The other issue is how 150 years ago we gave railroads incredible handouts of land ownership, not just in terms of the amount of land, but also in terms of the type of ownership. In a lot of cases, railroads have more sovereignty over their land than do the local and state jurisdictions it runs through. If you're a city trying to improve a railroad crossing and the railroad doesn't feel like cooperating, you're just fucked with zero recourse.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The solution is to make freight rail companies run on timetables again with shorter trains.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would shorter trains be able to make up for the lack of cargo in trucks?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You need to run more trains, but a schedule will make it easier to hire qualified people to do so.

A lot of what has made current freight rail shitty in the USA is that a lot of freight rail companies seem hyper fixated on only the most profitable routes at the exclusion of everything else. This has caused freight rail companies to adopt some really terrible labor practices, which has led to labor shortages.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But how many trains is more trains? Because you're talking about enough trains to make up for the loss of thousands upon thousands of trucks from the road. That sounds a hell of a lot more than, say, one train an hour. In fact, it sounds like people would be held up at crossings constantly.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

One train per hour would be on the very high side. It would likely be a lot less.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Why would it be a lot less? I just looked it up and there are 13.86 million trucks on the road in the US. How many cars would a train need to make up for that in a once-per-hour schedule over a 24-hour period?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

While it may be more efficient (in time, energy, labor) to have something make most of its long haul journey on a train, I have to think that the time between "I need to send this" and "it is moving" is much shorter with trucking than with trains.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Pretty much answering your last paragraph: Relevant John Oliver segment

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There’s also an article somewhere around here about an attempted renaissance in shipping. They headlined the Great Lakes, but included that Chicago could be a hub connecting the Great Lakes to the Mississippi River system- together those cover a huge portion of the US

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Might not be the best idea either considering the Mississippi was so low in 2022 that barges got grounded.