this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
229 points (92.9% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2764 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Forester@yiffit.net 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I will happily sell the land under my house to let you store sealed vessels of nuclear material. There permanently. I can do that with 100% confidence because I understand the science involved in the matters. If it's buried deep enough in a proper container, there is no risk.

[–] DdCno1@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it's so simple, why did a highly developed nation find no solution for it over the course of decades? There are no perfect containers that don't leak, there is no perfect storage location that doesn't have a chance of contaminating groundwater. The real world doesn't work like that.

[–] akakunai@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not considered worth undertaking such an initiative when most nuclear power plants have no problem just leaving the heavy (solid concrete and steel) casks as they are. They are not some looming threat, and they just sit there, outside, taking up a pretty small amount of space on the plants' property. Nothing else is done because there is no real incentive to move them; no one cares.

[–] DdCno1@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just sitting outside, exposed to the elements, changing temperatures and humidity? What a brilliant idea.

There's a reason we aren't doing this.

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, the containers are steel filled with concrete. We also leave our bridges and buildings outside, exposed to the elements.

The place in the world you are most likely to know the exact amount of radiation you are receiving at any moment is probably at a nuclear power plant. Its not like they just abandon them and never check on them or anything. They sit out in the open just... chillin. Being generally monitored but mostly just.... chillin.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thankfully we have this miracle invention called paint . You can hit one of these things with a train and you'll kill the train. The flask will be fine. https://youtu.be/1mHtOW-OBO4?si=_VEjko6YDyKfnz31

We do do this all the time. This is currently the solution. We put it in giant flasks and store it on site because ninnies like you won't let us bury it

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Good for you. Once you actually do that, report back how its going. Its easy to post a statement like that in an anonymous online forum.