this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

47952 readers
1748 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
34
Is anyone using VMware under a Wayland host? (infosec.pub)
submitted 6 months ago by MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub to c/linux@lemmy.ml
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been using VMware Player (free version) for a while now and it's been working fine. Recently I switched to Wayland and VMware's grab input behavior broke. The guest gets most keys correctly but Alt and Super are intercepted by the host. Clicking on the vm also gives me a remote desktop popup on the host prompting to allow remote interaction which gives some weird results both on the host and guest. Apparently this is a known issue with gnome(?) and the only workaround is to add Super to any shortcut (eg. Super+Alt+Tab) but this obviously doesn't work for all shortcuts.

I'm using Gnome on Fedora and Ubuntu and they seem to have the same behavior (but no remote desktop popup on Ubuntu). Both work fine on X11. I've also tested both VMware player 16 and 17.

So if anyone is using VMware on Wayland, do you know of a combination that works? Does it work on KDE? Should I just switch to Virtualbox? I'd really rather keep Wayland if possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Better question is who is using VMware at all. QEMU+virt-manager on top.

[–] MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I was forced to use it for a project and then just stuck with it for its simplicity

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why?

[–] MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If you don't need many features it's easier to quickly set up and create a vm than VirtualBox. Well until now anyway. I haven't tried the other alternatives mentioned here, they might be better in that aspect too.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

If you want simple, GNOME Boxes is hard to beat.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Virtual box is slow and requires kernel modules just like VMware. Seems easier to use something native.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's got really good hardware graphics acceleration.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So does KVM

[–] HeyLow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Specifically for Windows vms without a GPU passed to it, VMware tends to do a way better job at least in my testing

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you install the virtio drivers KVM based virtualization it will work way better. You can even copy and paste

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, Windows on KVM without GPU acceleration is not ideal. Also setting up a VM with all the bells and whistles like a shared folder, USB, printing is still easier on VMware than virt-manager. I've recently switched all my Windows VMs from VMware to KVM/virt-manager.