this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
74 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16752 readers
592 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I may have played Factorio for longer, but Factorio didn't make me feel emotions like Frostpunk did. Playtime isn't the only measure of a game's worth.

[–] otacon239@feddit.de 6 points 6 months ago

What Remains of Edith Finch is a great way to break this metric as well. Fantastic emotional rollercoaster of a story that’s over in about 2-3 hours. The original Portal also fits here. Probably about 4-6 hours for most people, but hits hard on quality and impact.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Playtime isn’t the only measure of a game’s worth.

This concept seems to be lost on many these days. If a game doesn't provide gaas-levels of constant content, or have endless "endgame", it's considered a rip-off. For me, some of the shortest games I've played have been the most impactful and worthwhile.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Y'all be strawmaning me here. There's such a wealth of video games to choose from, I generally have no problem finding stuff I will thoroughly enjoy while staying well above my value threshold.

Additionally, how much a game costs to play per hr doesn't necessarily have any relationship with how enjoyable it is.

The article is specifically boasting about play time metrics, so I don't think it's unreasonable to look at how it compares to other games in similar or adjacent genres.

[–] Ech@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, for one, that’s the only metric you chose to measure games by, so I’m not sure what else you would expect. Should we reply as if you used an entirely unmentioned metric?

Second, I specifically mentioned “many”, not you in particular. That’s not strawmaning, that’s talking about a general trend.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Just because I mentioned that metric doesn't mean that's the only thing I care about when choosing what games I want to buy/play. Some people chose to interpret my comment in the most uncharitable way.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

*Instance federation issues. Response reposted on alt account.

[–] Arondeus@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Go listen to Sentient a few more times while thinking about what you've done to those poor bugs and tell me again that Factorio doesn't make you feel anything.