this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
177 points (88.6% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3588 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] livus@mander.xyz 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The UN officials aren't saying any of those things. Here's a tldr of the issue

  • The platform is meant to be in Northern Gaza where the worst of the starvation is

  • Israel wants it to be moved south to an Israeli choke point

  • Israel is about to close the crossings in South Gaza so it can attack Rafah

  • If the tiny amount of aid that can come in is able to be diverted to South Gaza then Israel may face less international condemnation over this phase of the Gaza genocide.

Please help me understand why delivering food and medicine to Gaza is bad.

If there is a starving child and you can choose to deliver them the nutrients they need but instead you choose to give them half a peanut instead, in a really theatrical way, that's obviously bad right?

That's what's happening here.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

At no point was a pier planned for north Gaza, the first place to be evacuated, six months ago.

Israel will be inspecting every delivery since Hamas has proved again and again that if it takes part in international commerce, it will be in the business of killing Jews. That's why they didn't have their own port to begin with. It's not a choke point, it's a highway interchange. That's generally where you want to build the port. It's literally the opposite of a choke point.

Egypt is in charge of the southern border crossing not Israel. Egypt doesn't want terrorists moving weapons and fighters over its border, either.

[–] livus@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

We are all familiar with the genocidaires' explanations/pretexts for why they are blockading humanitarian aid, thanks, you don't need to rehash them here.

Egypt doesn't want terrorists

More to the point Egypt doesn't want to give Israel a pretext for constant drone strikes in Egyptian territory now that every Palestinian refugee child is supposedly "Hamas".

But either side can close a border, that's intrinsic to borders.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

Eef we let de blecks take part in international commerce eet will be in de business of killing whites.

  • Some Boer.