Programmer Humor

32396 readers

436 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

688

manyThreadsAreBetterThanOne (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] expr@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Umm, queueing is standard practice particularly when a task is performance intensive and needs limited resources.

Basically any programming language using any kind of asynchronous runtime is using queues in their scheduler, as well.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Could be I was not clear when I wrote performance, I am talking about High Performance Computing, where you want to spend all CPU cycles on solving your problem. While taking Amdal's Law into account. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law

[–] expr@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Ah gotcha, fair enough. Definitely depends on the workload. If you have compute you want to dedicate to solely to a single task, have at it.