127
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by activistPnk to c/anticonsumption

I think it was the prime minister (or spokesperson) who made this very clever argument: (paraphrasing) “we are not taking away choice… cigarettes are designed to inherently take away your choice by trapping you in an addiction.”

I’m not picking sides here, just pointing out a great piece of rhetoric to spin the policy as taking away something that takes away your choice. Effectively putting forward the idea that you don’t have choice to begin with.

(sorry to say this rhetoric was not mentioned in the linked article; I just heard it on BBC World Service)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

A different government came in and cancelled it to fund tax cuts

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
127 points (97.0% liked)

Anticonsumption

279 readers
66 users here now

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS