this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
117 points (77.7% liked)

Linux

48083 readers
911 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vanderbilt@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Man I wish FreeBSD hadn't fallen to the wayside. It's really cohesive and feels put together in a way not Linux distro ever has.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except it uses push over licensing

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's a GPL point of view. Most BSD users I've talked to prefer a more permissive license. Theo said: "GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope -- the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time. But once the code is GPL'd, we cannot get it back. Ironic."

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

i guess this might be why a lot of processing and storage clusters use it behind closed doors with proprietary code we will never see.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

Which is fine with for example OpenBSD, they write "ISC or Berkeley style licences are preferred, the GPL is not acceptable when adding new code, NDAs are never acceptable. We want to make available source code that anyone can use for ANY PURPOSE, with no restrictions. We strive to make our software robust and secure, and encourage companies to use whichever pieces they want to."

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And where system is doing better, Linux or BSD? Also the point of the GPL is not to give back. You can have GPL code that is read only and it doesn't hurt a thing. The point is you can get the code running on your computer and freely make changes to it.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

Doing better in what way? Number of installs or being robust and secure? If we go by numbers one could argue that Windows is doing best on the desktop, and that proprietary code therefore is something to strive for. Either way it's a tangent of the original statement, that the BSD license is a "pushover" license, which I oppose, because the BSD devs are deliberately allowing their code to be used by anyone for any reason.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

You know, I've never used it. Maybe I'll install it in a VM tonight and give it a whirl.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is it still worth using? Say, for a web dev? Or is it less supported?

[–] vanderbilt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly it isn't. Support for anything front-end related is way more sparse compared to Linux.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's a shame. I'd love a new exotic OS to try.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever heard FreeBSD described as either "new" or "exotic"

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

I'll give you "new" but it's about as far from exotic as you can get... Not a bad thing, BTW, and I highly recommend giving it a try, it's an excellent system, though probably better for a server than a workstation/desktop (though it definitely can be a very good workstation/desktop if you like)

Its Ports system is the inspiration for Gentoo's Portage, BTW

[–] vanderbilt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

“hello system” is pretty nice to look at, and has some Mac-isms I find helpful. FreeBSD has a new release recently, so maybe Nomad or GhostBSD could be worth trying. You’ll find FreeBSD is a lot more “consistent” compared to Linux, but be prepared for random hardware to not work.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's usually used for storage servers these days. ZFS is most stable there.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Ix (Truenas) is transitioning to linux though.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, it’s decades older with a history of being used in business critical applications…