this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
302 points (96.9% liked)

News

23284 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Greased by lobbying and campaign cash, tax breaks for retirement savings are one thing Congress agrees on. But they also blow out the deficit and add to income inequality.

Five months before Congress faced a near-catastrophic standoff over the debt ceiling, with Republicans demanding restrictions to food and Medicaid programs to rein in spending, a bill that raised the cost of private retirement savings accounts to $282 billion per year was quietly signed into law.

In this era of deeply divided politics, the 2022 bill known as Secure 2.0 was hailed as a bipartisan success — a victory for average Americans. It had sailed through the House by a whopping 414-5 vote. It followed four other major bills passed between 1996 and 2019 that dramatically expanded taxpayer savings – all equally lauded as bipartisan victories.

But that rare issue that brought a divided Washington together also increased wealth disparities and the federal deficit. And the victory was most strongly applauded by the burgeoning financial services industry, for whom tax-advantaged retirement savings has transformed a $7 trillion retirement market in 1995 to a $38.4 trillion behemoth in 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, all the underpaid people having to choose between food and rent just need to bot spend money on either so they can invest it.

Yes, great insight!

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You don't need anyone to invest the money for you. You can get a free account, with free trades, and then just buy index funds.

Even 5 dollars a day can put you close to millionaire over a 40 years.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love that you assume people who can't afford both rent and food have 5 bucks a day just laying around.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I responded specifically to the claim that you need to hire a bot to do it for you. I made no assumptions about anything.

While I feel for people who really can't save anything because their situation is so dire. But that's not true for plenty of people and this idea that it's too expensive to save is just an excuse to never do so.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, you replied to my post about people who can't afford both rent and food, whoch was preceeded by comments about how everyone has a job with a 401k whiach was proceeded by a comment about not having any extra money to invest after loving expenses.

Surr, most people should invest, but we were originally talking about how not everyone can do that and nobody listened because they assumed everyone has easy access to retirement investment options through their jobs and extra money to do so.

Go back and read the actual posts.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I responded to you obnoxiously claiming that you have to pay something (in your case, a bot) to do it for you.

I explicitly started my post with "you don't have to most someone to do it" to make it clear what my argument is about.

I'm sorry it wasn't clear. I'll try to do better in the future. Could you give me a pointer?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Provide the quote where I said that.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

just need to bot spend

My bad. I translated that as you saying you "just need a bot to spend" but now see it was just a typo, and the meaning still should have been clear to me.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Seems weird that you focused on that and not the proceeding part about not being able to afford both rent and food. Why would a bot even be able to solve a situation where they can't afford things in the first place?

I apparently fixed it since I see "just need to not spend" and don't remember fixing it. Probably a delay in federation.