this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
454 points (96.3% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
1684 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I put it in my force balance equations, it's a force. It doesn't matter that it's from curving spacetime rather than exchanging particles, it still exerts force on things.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But the point of general relativity is that a free-floating observer is equivalent to an observer in free space. That means that falling due to gravity, which you call a force, is an unaccelerated movement, i.e. no force.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If I take a relativistic frame of reference. If I take an 'absolute' non moving frame of reference, gravity shows up as a force. I use the later for calculating loads and statics, even though it's technically not correct. And in that case gravity shows up as a force.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago

I'm not trying to argue approximations. Physics is just approximations all the way down. But as a physicist, I also love arguing about technicalities, and that's also kinda the point of science communities for me.