this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
712 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59999 readers
2197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 99 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Social media company’s don’t understand what makes a Social network great. It isn’t advertising, or social manipulation, or exorbitant subscription fees and API charges. It isn’t restriction of speech or freedom of speech, it isn’t algorithmically controlled moderation and curation.

It is the people that make a social network great.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is the people that make a social network great.

You're right. I say this every time these conversations come up. It's the people that hold the power. Imagine how quickly things would change if everyone stopped using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Threads, WhatsApp, Telegram, Snapchat, etc. overnight. From billions/millions to users, to zero. Can you imagine how quickly the companies would change/adjust/pivot/react?

Social media company’s don’t understand what makes a Social network great.

Disagree. They know. It's just that they're trapped in an unethical business model that will never allow them to make it great. This is because the platform's interests are constantly at war with the user's interests. This was a critical mistake in the earlier days of the internet.

Google itself identified this in the early days in a paper that they wrote. They originally just wanted to organize the internet. But with an advertising revenue model, the interests of the advertisers was ultimately gonna be more important.

Call it "enshittification": Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They don't care about making a great or even good product. It's solely about making as much money in as short a time period as possible, regardless of the long term consequences.

[–] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I don't have access to Twitter's balance sheet, but I'd wager a guess that they're on financial life support in the short term, and they've got a stage 4 cancer diagnosis in the long term.

The only thing Twitter has going for them over a competitor like Mastodon or Threads, is their name. And Musk has made sure their name is covered in shit and mud.

Twitter was doomed before Musk bought them, and they're super doomed now.

[–] volodymyr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While it is true, there are also some factors which make people converge on some platforms. Factors beyond simply presence of other people. Like technical features.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The biggest technical feature that draws users is the Interface. Twitter didn’t gain popularity (or even the Bird icon and “tweet” moniker) until Tweetie, Twitteriffic and eventually Tweetbot came along.

Reddit was just a website for (no offence intended) “neckbearded basement dwelling incels” until RiF and Apollo made it more accessible.

Mastodon usage soared when 3rd Party Twitter apps were killed and once once again when Ivory was released.

I didn’t even know about Lemmy until I heard ‪@christianselig@mastodon.social‬ and ‪@gruber@mastodon.social‬ mentioned it on The Talk Show. I didn’t start using it regularly until I discovered wefwef and Memmy.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong about there being multiple factors, but I'd argue that this is often the least important factor. The technical features are easily replicated. (See: threads, stories, reels/tiktoks/shorts, etc.)

Network effects, on the other hand, have a stranglehold like no other.

You're on Facebook because your family's on there. You're on Twitter because your favorite meme pages are on there. You're on Instagram because the photographer you really like is on there. So on and so forth.