this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
62 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be clear, you’re referring to generative AI and artificial general intelligence. There are many forms of AI that downright deliver. The field is evolving at such a speed, I think nay-saying will look naïve in hindsight.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Too many forms of AI (for example AI "art") rely so heavily on the idea that anything that can be seen on the internet is fair game to feed into a dataset regardless of license or intellectual property, that I don't see any legitimate path forward.

EITHER these companies start paying data/IP owners a license (which may be prohibitively expensive for the amount of data that's needed to produce anything good) OR society is completely overhauled/evolved in a way so that copyright and intellectual property are no longer things that exist (which is unlikely considering the political resistance to anything even remotely socialist, and likely means the end of human-made commercial media as artists would no longer be able to make a living.)

I don't see any way in which the status quo, in which artists are just being flagrantly ripped off by AI companies, can legitimately continue.

[–] SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net 1 points 1 year ago

I've been involved in a lot of failed AI projects (failed at the onset because the premise was wrong for the job). The field didn't start yesterday.

Not saying it can't work at all ever, but it's much more limited than people think it is based on a good demo in chatgpt.