this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
824 points (98.5% liked)

science

14709 readers
436 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Hot damn! Limitless fusion power is only thirty years away!

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Like it has been for the past 30 years (which, I assume, was the joke here.)

If fusion research was funded adequately we'd probably have it by now, but I don't know if it's the energy lobby or what that means that it's chronically underfunded. An actually working fusion reactor design would bring about such an upheaval in the energy markets that I wouldn't be surprised if plutocrats had a hand in making sure the research receives orders of magnitude less money than it should.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Existing energy conglomerates (ie, oil and gas) probably send their army of lobbyists around the world to spread FUD about fusion. Thus minimal funding. 🪦

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Not while fusion is 30 years away. They'll wait until it's closer to 2 years.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Maybe. We all (here) wish fusion power was funded better and understand how useful it could be for humanity if we can make it happen, but ….

  • yesterday I read about the Stellerator using 3D printed parts
  • in this thread, someone commented on using ai to drive containment
  • I’m sure teams must be using the latest materials.

It’s quite possible that we would have always needed the rest of the world to catch up

[–] ours@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Breakthroughs will bring in investment and then things can accelerate if it ends up viable.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's not limitless, you still need fuel. Especially tritium doesn't really occur naturally because of its extremely short half-life, current plans for ITER involve breeding tritium from lithium in the fusion reactor. The closest to limitless power we have is PV.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Tritium is a convenience, not a necessity. If researchers manage to build a functional fusion reactor which captures the energy, we can find substitutes.

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A reactor that produces enough of its own fuel.... It's starting to sound like a perpetual motion machine.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Read again, there are plans to use lithium instead of tritium, still limited.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$10 says fusion power also ends up being the cure for Alzheimer's.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The advancements in magnetic field manipulation will be of great value to the ferrite-infused prostate medicine field! Also: better selfie camera's!