this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
87 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
457 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] this@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At the risk of upsetting people, most if not all religions. They can't all be right.

[โ€“] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that a lot of Atheists oversimplify religion. (NB: I'm Atheist myself.)

"True" and "false" only apply to statements about reality (epistemic). And sure, religion has a lot of them: "God exists", "if you fornicate you'll go to Hell", "the world was created in seven days" etc. I think that most of them are false.

However a religion isn't just its epistemic statements. It's also morals, practices/rituals, and a community. Those things cannot be true or false, because they are not statements about reality. You need another ground to refer to them, as "good" vs. "bad" (deontic).

[โ€“] OddFed@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but atheism does not mean nihilism. It doesn't even mean opposing religions in general. It simply means you do not believe in a higher (or multiple) being often referred to as "god".

Do I believe in the power of love? Yes! Do I spiritually put my family and friends over anything else? Yes! Do I believe that I need to help people, even though it is not beneficial for me? Yes! Do I believe that placebo works? Yes! ...

[โ€“] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm aware - and that's part of my reasoning.

Atheism itself isn't even a whole set of epistemic statements. It's lack of belief in one statement. It doesn't imply any sort set of values (like nihilism, secular humanism, satanism... or even the ones from the religions), nor give you any practice (no mass, no "it's Salah time, drop what you're doing for a prayer"), nor it makes you part of a community (much more than "we don't believe in centaurs, we should hang around togerther" would).

And Atheists often transpose that into religion, oversimplifying it into "you believe in one or more gods". But religion was never just that, it's a lot more things. And most of those things can be good or bad, healthy or unhealthy, but not true or false.

[โ€“] OddFed@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but I'm not sure where someone stated something like this in this thread? Especially because the initial post followed a completely different logical reasoning.

[โ€“] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

OP asked "something many people believe but is not true". The other poster replied "religion". I'm showing that religion contains things that are not true, but religion as a whole cannot be true or false.

[โ€“] Dubois_arache@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

haha it depends, for religious people their credence is everything in their life, is their true. Of course I am with development of reason and science, but, as Adorno said once, if you retire a system of credence from people who have not known something more than religion, their entire life loose all its content... that's why I also learned to be more shy to argue about others people religious feelings, believings, because it is something very respected and symbolized. Also, Hegel said that religious thought is like a "phase" of "society thought", a phase that has be to analized and lived by every person (and lived by the society itself)...

[โ€“] this@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Yea I more or less agree with that sentiment. I myself am an athiest but I view religion in general as a coping mechanism, and real or not if you take away coping mechanisms then you risk doing actual harm to people(psychologically), which is why I try to be as anti-evangelical and secular as I can. I just wish people would stop using it as justification for the shitty things they do. I wouldn't mind more people thinking like I do but they have to come to that conclusion on their own.

[โ€“] sup@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I have the same thought, and is the primary reason why I'm agnostic. I commented this elsewhere in this thread that might be relevant here too:

I'm an agnostic and I read this book called "The God Theory" by Bernard Haisch. The author is a man of science and approaches this problem from a (semi) scientific perspective.

Over the course of the book, he makes hypotheses and challenges them and eventually arrives at a theory that seems a workable explanation of the state of the world and religion in general.

It's a very interesting read and I would 100% recommend it.