this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
194 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3383 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Unironically yes, sufficient levels of violence will solve US divisions.

Anyone that thinks that they genuinely want this though has never lived in a country going through a civil war.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If anything happens it won't be a civil war. There is no good geological line to use as a point to start. It will be much more akin to the Troubles of Northern Ireland. Which may be honestly worse.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

The biggest difference would be that there isn't an outside country that could or would step in. The US military would probably end up being divided, as many of the upper officers take oaths of loyalty to the country and constitution seriously, while a number of the enlisted people are much more partisan.

We're already seeing the beginnings of low-level terrorism, with threats of assassination against judges and other gov't officials. Mostly--almost exclusively--from the political right. It's not much of a step from there to actual violence.

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago

Or they lack a shred of empathy and/or imagination.

I've never lived in a country going through civil war, but I don't have to do that to tell you that it's not something I want ever.

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the ammo box is literally the fourth box of democracy after the soap box, the ballot box, and the jury box, but it's only to be used when the other three have failed

At the end of the day, might makes right, so we better make damn well sure the side we believe in has more of it

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I agree. "Sufficient" is a lot more than people would ever want to see

[–] Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, we can see in Libya how well this worked out