this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
98 points (72.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you think no one tells Joe Biden what he should be doing on the daily you might be more demented than he is.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"should do" and "to do" are two entirely different things. :)

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Well… they also do that.

Also, even taking that statement as literal - is that supposed to be a good thing? “Despite his staff and advisors urging him to not run again, in a bid for power he is again!”

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is it that there are all these people who have nothing to do with political office in their daily lives who know all the personal conversations and thoughts of the inner circles of the presidency?

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you unaware of the extremely basic fact that essentially every president in US history has relied incredibly strongly on a wide team of advisors and cabinet members.

They teach you that in middle school civics. Did you think the presidency was like in a movie where it’s just one guy who decides to do everything he does? Do you think Biden sits there with a calculator running the numbers??

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 5 months ago

Certain flanks of the party saying he shouldn't but not putting up anyone who should is hardly a consensus, plus to assume it's 'a bid for power', like some kind of movie super villain here, totally not like something someone who would try and prevent congressional certification of the election would do.

I do tire of these threads, 'Trump is evil incarnate and must be stopped by... scattering votes for the only viably running candidate all over the map?'.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not "in a bid for power", it's to block Trump. If Trump weren't running Biden would likely dust off his hands, go "My work here is done!" and quietly retire at the end of his term.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-not-sure-he-would-seek-re-election-if-trump-was-not-2023-12-05/

If something happened to take Trump out of the race, especially between now and the conventions in July and August, I think Biden would bow out, but he won't as long as Trump is around.

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I simply don’t believe that Biden is the most electable person in the country against Trump lol

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He's the only person who's already beaten him.

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, I guess we’ll have to see if he can do it again. I don’t bemoan people for voting for him, but he doesn’t have mine

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

so you're voting for Trump? effectively or directly?

[–] Minotaur@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, I’m just voting third party.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

that's what I said. you're effectively voting for Trump.

You don't understand how the voting system in the USA works, obviously, which is a shame.

I look forward to preferential/ ranked voting coming in, but until that day, you're a fucking retard.