this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
998 points (96.1% liked)

tumblr

3382 readers
403 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If the prices didn't go up because of a shortage, because there was never a shortage, why did prices go back down again?

The law of supply and demand explains the price of eggs. If you're saying it's wrong then what's your better egg-splanation?

[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The prices went back down right after the federal government announced a price fixing investigation and a bunch of news coverage came out about how their claims were bogus.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s correlational, not causal. There isn’t going to be a definitive source on this

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the federal government announced a price fixing investigation

a bunch of news coverage came out about how their claims were bogus

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Then you can find it, if you really care.

The harder you look, the more conclusively you prove you're right!

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, what I care about (in this context) is other people making arguments that they can't substantiate. I'm not spending my time trying to substantiate someone else's arguments, I spend enough time doing that for my own.

I have no need to prove that I'm right. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real. When wealthy money addicts rip you off they pretend its a force of nature ripping you off. Behind every money transaction there is a human being with an address who made a choice.

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real.

Lol, okay bud. If that's the case you should start a business selling eggs for $100 each.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Eggs? You can offer to buy and sell stocks at whatever price you want. You just won't complete any trades if you offer to buy at $1 and sell at $1,000,000 dollars per share. If "supply and demand" didn't exist, you could become a millionaire in one trade.

Although, I suspect what this person means is: many markets are not free from price collusion. The stock market is very liquid because there are many buyers and sellers. You literally cannot corner the market because it would require too much money, and it's illegal.

This creates quick movements based on news and sentiment. Food prices do not operate this quickly, but they do move based on available supply and demand.

Other markets have much more collusion. When there are only three producers, collusion is inevitable. If one seller raises the price and still finds buyers, the other two will follow without any communication between them. The solution is doing whatever you can to not buy what they are selling. Demand moves markets, not supply. They are raising the price because people are paying it.

Also, better regulation from the FTC would help.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

you should start a business selling eggs for $100 each.

Mike? Mike Nelson? Is that you?

"Eggs are complicated, they should cost like $100 each!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G0stojwYjI

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real.

Um, so you don't think that when a commodity becomes more scarce that the demand for it increases as a consequence?

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's also a thing called price gouging where companies fuck over the public because they know they can. And then they keep the prices artificially high even after supply increases two, three, four fold over demand. Because they know they can.

Not that I am suggesting corporations are corrupt and would let people starve just to make a profit. Heaven forfend.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, price gouging is an example of supply and demand

Keeping prices high is an example of price fixing, not supply and demand. It requires companies colluding with each other because, otherwise, one company would just lower their prices to get more business and make more money

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Raising your prices by a reasonable amount to meet extra costs is supply and demand.

Raising your prices by three, four, five or six times a reasonable amount is gouging and is not supply and demand. It's gouging and fucking over your customers, especially those who need your products.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Scarecety-induced demand is not law of supply and demand

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

Er, please explain your logic.

the law of supply and demand is only true in true capitalism. True capitalism doesn't exist because it doesn't work.