this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
998 points (96.1% liked)

tumblr

3382 readers
405 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 7 months ago (4 children)

That was 17% of the total population. The price went up by 400-900%, and there was never a shortage. As usual, we got shafted.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

There absolutely was a shortage.

the current outbreak of the virus that began in early 2022 has prompted officials to slaughter nearly 82 million birds, mostly egg-laying chickens, in 47 U.S. states

https://apnews.com/article/avian-flu-chicken-outbreak-california-poultry-eggs-976f0f82843bf716dbad64f459b4b8be

Getting downvoted, but no one has a factual counter argument.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Queue to buy eggs kind of shortage? Food stamps to be able to buy kind of shortage? Or corporations using any reason to jack up prices kind of shortage?

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The best part is they’ll raise prices due to “inflation” or whatever, then when supply increases…the prices don’t go down!

I’m honestly wondering what the end game is for these MBA asshats ruining everything. Is it really that many people so selfish and myopic that we have to suffocate on this one planet and never reach?

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

You know what the end game is, and if we could just cut to it while we still have a chance to at least kinda salvage the climate and biodiversity, that would be great.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If the prices didn't go up because of a shortage, because there was never a shortage, why did prices go back down again?

The law of supply and demand explains the price of eggs. If you're saying it's wrong then what's your better egg-splanation?

[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The prices went back down right after the federal government announced a price fixing investigation and a bunch of news coverage came out about how their claims were bogus.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] supercritical@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s correlational, not causal. There isn’t going to be a definitive source on this

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the federal government announced a price fixing investigation

a bunch of news coverage came out about how their claims were bogus

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Then you can find it, if you really care.

The harder you look, the more conclusively you prove you're right!

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, what I care about (in this context) is other people making arguments that they can't substantiate. I'm not spending my time trying to substantiate someone else's arguments, I spend enough time doing that for my own.

I have no need to prove that I'm right. Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real. When wealthy money addicts rip you off they pretend its a force of nature ripping you off. Behind every money transaction there is a human being with an address who made a choice.

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real.

Lol, okay bud. If that's the case you should start a business selling eggs for $100 each.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Eggs? You can offer to buy and sell stocks at whatever price you want. You just won't complete any trades if you offer to buy at $1 and sell at $1,000,000 dollars per share. If "supply and demand" didn't exist, you could become a millionaire in one trade.

Although, I suspect what this person means is: many markets are not free from price collusion. The stock market is very liquid because there are many buyers and sellers. You literally cannot corner the market because it would require too much money, and it's illegal.

This creates quick movements based on news and sentiment. Food prices do not operate this quickly, but they do move based on available supply and demand.

Other markets have much more collusion. When there are only three producers, collusion is inevitable. If one seller raises the price and still finds buyers, the other two will follow without any communication between them. The solution is doing whatever you can to not buy what they are selling. Demand moves markets, not supply. They are raising the price because people are paying it.

Also, better regulation from the FTC would help.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

you should start a business selling eggs for $100 each.

Mike? Mike Nelson? Is that you?

"Eggs are complicated, they should cost like $100 each!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G0stojwYjI

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law of supply and demand is not real.

Um, so you don't think that when a commodity becomes more scarce that the demand for it increases as a consequence?

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's also a thing called price gouging where companies fuck over the public because they know they can. And then they keep the prices artificially high even after supply increases two, three, four fold over demand. Because they know they can.

Not that I am suggesting corporations are corrupt and would let people starve just to make a profit. Heaven forfend.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, price gouging is an example of supply and demand

Keeping prices high is an example of price fixing, not supply and demand. It requires companies colluding with each other because, otherwise, one company would just lower their prices to get more business and make more money

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Raising your prices by a reasonable amount to meet extra costs is supply and demand.

Raising your prices by three, four, five or six times a reasonable amount is gouging and is not supply and demand. It's gouging and fucking over your customers, especially those who need your products.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Scarecety-induced demand is not law of supply and demand

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

Er, please explain your logic.

the law of supply and demand is only true in true capitalism. True capitalism doesn't exist because it doesn't work.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey I'd love to see the population stats, got a source?

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I searched egg laying hen population by year. The end of 2022, after the culling, it was 377 million.

Based on the article another comment had, the 80 mil was total birds killed, not just egg hens, so it was likely actually less than the 17% I estimated.