this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
562 points (97.5% liked)

Open Source

30349 readers
2249 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think it can depend on how and why you're being pushy too. I've definitely had to have my fair share of passionate conversations and strongly advocating (yes, you could say pushing) for what I believe is best for the direction of a project with my fellow maintainers, especially when it comes to important things (like how to handle specific security issues etc since there's not always one way of handling it). Generally speaking though you're right.

[–] protozoan_ninja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that's fair, there are driven people, and people who are pushing for something, right, but in this case, look at the language used:

Progress will not happen until there is new maintainer. XZ for C has sparse commit log too. Dennis you are better off waiting until new maintainer happens or fork yourself. Submitting patches here has no purpose these days. The current maintainer lost interest or doesn't care to maintain anymore. It is sad to see for a repo like this. [src]

Tons of emotional button-pushing and pressure, but not on technical grounds. Just trying to make the dev feel crappy about themselves.