this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
270 points (97.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
1066 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bermuda@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Not even really that but people tend to think that others have just outright stopped making maps. "Haven't we made all the maps already?" Is a common response I get when I tell them. They seem to forget about data analysis and all that.

[โ€“] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And, well... They're not super wrong about how mapped earth is. They just misjudge the sheer, enormous amount of detail we need (which keeps growing with our ability to get more of it), along with the fact that sometimes it changes a bit.

[โ€“] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Haven't we mapped everything already?" is a bit like saying "Haven't we born everyone already?".

GIS also is far more complex than what is visible in a single map. An example for this are the capabilities of satellites observing the earth, IIRC very few to none of them are mere security cameras - most of them have quite interesting spectra to observe green house gas emissions or vegetation (ie. land use changes) for example. GIS can then use this data and gather hidden information, sometimes over large spatial dimensions.

[โ€“] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Exactly. We know what shape the land is even for the bottoms of the oceans. But that doesn't mean we're done making maps.