this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
109 points (91.6% liked)

Fediverse

28362 readers
1265 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't get me wrong I'm a big fan but it seems like the fediverse could theoretically exist with like 5 users whereas a commercial company needs users for revenue. It feels like we are using the masters tools to try to destroy the masters house

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tkc@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah, I never get all these comments saying "if Lemmy wants to get big" it needs to do X (probably some Reddit feature), and " if Lemmy wants to succeed" if needs to do Y (some niche thing most people dont need).

Like, it's already successful doing exactly what it was intended for.

Possibly Lemmy is a lot of peoples first foray into FOSS software, and being the biggest and best, and profits go brrr isn't the aim.

Capitalism is a hell of a drug when it's all you've known.

[–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think if this is what Lemmy is intended for it’s sad and will always a niche thing. I refuse to believe that this is what Lemmy is aiming for.

[–] tkc@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's wrong with it being a niche thing. It's been around for long enough being just that.

I'm not saying Lemmy can't be more, just there's nothing "wrong" with it as is. I jdon't like people offering up the opinions I mentioned above.

[–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I mean I guess it’s fine. It just doesn’t provide much value to me personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)