this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
16 points (83.3% liked)

movies

1776 readers
246 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/13485452

I linked to this in a previous post along with my hot take about general things (https://hachyderm.io/@maegul/112132220413742000)

But really, if you're into films, into VFX/SFX/behind-the-scenes stuff, and find the state of VFX in the film industry interesting (I'm constantly amazed at the size of the VFX credits in films) ...

... then this is really worth a watch.

I found part 3 particularly enjoyable as it looks at the history of using matte paintings for what CGI is often used now ... and also looks at oppenheimer to, in the end, illustrate that the term "CGI" and the CGI v practical divide are not really useful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can't believe Barbie edited all blue screens out of 45 minutes of behind the scenes!

I just finished all 3 parts, it really was like a documentary. Looking forward to part 4 when it drops!

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I can’t believe Barbie edited all blue screens out of 45 minutes of behind the scenes!

Yep. That was the part the convinced me that something sinister is going on here. Cuz that was work. The BTS film had a VFX budget to hide the extent of the actual film's VFX budget. For some parts, allowing the audience to just focus on the conversations between actors etc, that would make sense. But throughout the whole/majority-of thing?!!

As I said in my linked prior post ... I think the whole "No CGI" or "practical effects hype" needs to look itself in the mirror as likely both uninformed and damaging to the people of a whole industry that makes our films look good in ways that we all deep down really appreciate. Yes CGI has looked crappy in the past. But so have many effects that were cutting edge for the time. Films are to be enjoyed as artistic and escapist phenomena, not to test our amateur VFX knowledge.