Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's just the excuse they came up with to justify the doctor's handwriting. It's a conspiracy

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

So astniiinteaesidsamisahnrtlbm is rleaadbe?

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Of course antidisestablishmentarianism is readable.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Waht aubot ltplpailokkllopiyioiotopritaetieatliocretnigtbtpahaleasaoibkeoprrrpiyadgrpasoacoetmooasyhhocmpapegokkolnyrlydmekteroekcisasalmietmlssgiekeoomlplaihhikoitrkanopahoenhpneagoohahheoooren?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Well I read it, I can tell you that.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No. But some people like syn_attack & NigelFrobisher enjoy a word jumble challenge.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

Well, LemmyKnowsBest!

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Brelay

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

I could read this haha