UK Nature and Environment

388 readers

59 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

GreyShuck@feddit.uk

Kim@feddit.uk

Spiralling deer population 'devastating' UK nature - prompting calls to reintroduce wolves and lynx (news.sky.com)

submitted 8 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A seemingly never-ending stream of deer bound across a main road, bringing traffic to a standstill. Two stags trot down a hospital corridor. A deer herd invades a surburban garden.

There's a new brand of wildlife video doing the rounds on social media - and the generally positive image enjoyed by the animals means the scenes may delight onlookers.

But many experts say the largely uncontrolled growth of Britain's deer population creates significant ecological dangers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe. But location and population density. Means hunting with guns off privrate land. Is a little impractical in the UK. Wolves and lynx tend to be a safer option in many locations.

[–] snota@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they can cull deer in Richmond park I think it can be done safely in most places. If the population is that rampant then the introduction of wolves and lynx would end up causing a spike in predator populations in short order that may force them to find food closer to humans as well, which would then lead to the need to cull the predator species. I'd expect that a cull would be required if predators are introduced to start everything off in a balanced state.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hence the off privrate land comment. Richmond is a royal Park where monitoring culls is easily achieved.

Wolves are not really a danger to humans. Dispite many fairly tales etc, they live with and avoid humans all over Europe. Like most wild predators they avoid humans. We have this idea from movies. Of wolves etc attacking humans. But even in India where leopards live in and around cities. We just don't hear of them. Sightings are rare.

I lived in GA USA for 10 years. While we don't have wolves there like more northern US areas. I often saw cyotes and black bears. Literally in Atlanta city center on a few occasions. Also one occasion a coyote crossing the road right in front of my car. 100ft from my drive. Small town just outside Atlanta (10min drive).

Yet 0 cases of human threats. Even though hunger and or habitats loss had drawn them to the city.

Wolves can safly manage dear populations in more public areas. Without having guns being fired throughout city streets and in suburban gardens. Unlike human hunters they tend to automatically look for weaker targets. Where humans trophy hunt.

Honestly I am not sure how you see eating dear changing,

We already do, people hunt dear on privrare land and pay a lot to do so. Following rules about what dear to hunt. And many do tend to eat the meat.

Its a rich person's hobby. Because in 2024. No human in the UK hunts for survival or cheaper food. It simply is not cheaper then farming.

So while I agree morally killing to eat seems better. Honestly allowing natural preditors that belong in the UK do it. Seems like the better option.