Chess

1896 readers

1 users here now

Play chess on-line

FIDE Rankings

September 2023

#	Player	Country	Elo
1	Magnus Carlsen	🇳🇴	2839
2	Fabiano Caruana	🇺🇸	2786
3	Hikaru Nakamura	🇺🇸	2780
4	Ding Liren 🏆	🇨🇳	2780
5	Alireza Firouzja	🇫🇷	2777
6	Ian Nepomniachtchi	🇷🇺	2771
7	Anish Giri	🇳🇱	2760
8	Gukesh D	🇮🇳	2758
9	Viswanathan Anand	🇮🇳	2754
10	Wesley So	🇺🇸	2753

Tournaments

Speed Chess Championship 2023

September 4 - September 22

Check also

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

jalda@sopuli.xyz

jalda@kbin.social

I think 1100s are harder than 1300s (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by ColoradoBoy@lemmy.world to c/chess@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have wide swings in my ELO on chess.com. My highest is 1425. I’m typically 1350. But I’ll nosedive into large slumps sometimes.

I have a much harder time if I slump below 1200 than if I stay in my usual 1300 range.

Has anyone else experienced this? I have some theories:

New accounts start at 1200 so you might have people who are really good but their ELO is not cemented yet.
Weird chess. The 1300 is playing more principled moves so there is less calculation in the opening. I’ve seen it before. The lower players are playing weird moves that require constant calculating.
Aggressive queen moves that I can sometimes punish, but again require way more calculating early than a 1300 who keeps their Q safe for longer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kephalos@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

I am playing on Lichess and just dropped from 700-800 range where I frequently played >800 ELO numbers back to the 600 range and in some way its also true there. I dropped down on an evening where I probably should have just stopped playing and so now I have to make my way up very concentrated against players that objectively don't develop their pieces well but somehow manage to make renegade moves that are challenging to counter...