this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
370 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
2518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 194 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So only three years of Steve Huffman's salary?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 59 points 8 months ago

Great marketing for an IPO ...... we need enough money to equal three times what our CEO gets

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 16 points 8 months ago

Watch as he burns through it in one:-).

Also, bold of us to assume that he has not already spent it:-P.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's in the form of stock options, which won't be worth any particularly noteworthy amount unless the IPO goes really well.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If it has a dollar valuation, if it's taxable, it can be liquidated.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Are you talking about writing them off?

Options come with the obligation to pay for the underlying asset, so unless they are valued above the strike price, they are effectively worse than worthless.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

No, I'm talking about real compensation.

Is it just options specifically, or grants, or ...?

Would the reported compensation be at the strike price, or the current valuation, or the difference?

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Not American, but I would assume the Black-Scholes model will be used for valuation.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago

Face value is unlikely to be the amount reported - I doubt the options are granted below the last reported market rate. Hence it's probably relative to the amount of underlying stock the options represent.

You'd have to check the SEC-filings for more accuracy than that.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Options can come with or without the obligation to buy the underlying asset. I'd assume they will never be worth less than worthless.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Less than worthless would be when exercised, not exercising would be worth 0 - unless you paid for the option contract, in which case not exercising would represent a loss.