this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Writing

1938 readers
10 users here now

A specific community for original shortform and longform writing, stories, worldbuilding, and other stuff of that nature.

Subcommunity of Creative


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is my work; I am also looking for constructive criticism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Could we think about repurposing the down-vote function to serve a different role? Similar to the report function, which signals a need for moderator review, the down-vote could be used in the same way to flag content that might require a second look. This could assist in handling extreme or illegal content without suppressing diverse opinions or content simply because it doesn't receive wide agreement.

What if we displayed only the "+1" upvotes on the website without showing any down-vote counts? This would maintain a positive atmosphere and could encourage more open dialogue. Essentially, a down-vote would transition from meaning "I disagree" to "this might need reviewing".

Importantly, if content isn't extreme or illegal but still gathers a significant amount of down-votes, it could be an indicator for the moderator to assess if further action is necessary. This shifts the down-vote function from being a tool for disagreement to a measure for maintaining the quality of discourse.

Reddit did try this, they use downvotes as a way to prevent showing poorly written or short content, but they didn't properly explain it and so I feel that it probably wouldn't be able to be explained.