this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
252 points (78.3% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6288 readers
375 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not a virtue to "not profit off of things". I don't care about Mr. Beast and a lot of charity is just whitewashing someone's legacy. But you can simply "not profit" by sitting in your underwear eating Cheetos. Does that help anyone?

Still, these dumb game shows are better than a lot of entertainment. Are you equally angry at "The Price is Right" or "Wheel of Fortune"? People go nuts about a basic ass car that they would normally shrug their shoulders at.

If you want to be angry at something, pick "Fear Factor". That made people do a lot of crazy shit. There's a reason it's cancelled.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social -3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not a virtue to "not profit off of things".

I strongly disagree with this assertion. If you do X and make $100k off of it vs doing X and making $0 off of it, the latter is much better morally and for the universe.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

How is it better? You've done X either way.

Also they're making money from their subscribers and likely creating a lot more awareness. Which is better for the "universe"

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Ignore them. When people talk about "morals" and "the universe" they are signalling that they can't be convinced otherwise.

There's no point in trying to convince someone who doesn't want to change their mind. They may not even believe what they're saying. Just a desire to believe is enough to harden someone's mind against outside ideas.

Everyone has things they want to be true. This person probably wants to be "moral" and in touch with "the universe". So you can't convince them that profit isn't bad. They have decided that profit is never moral, so by arguing with that you argue that their deepest beliefs are false. You can't win.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I strongly disagree with this assertion. If you do X and make $100k off of it vs doing X and making $0 off of it, the latter is much better morally and for the universe.

Do you consider that an absolute or would other factors make that stated stance invalid to you?

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago

Are you more likely to do x again if you got 100k for doing so vs nothing?

We both know the answer to that.

So does getting paid mean x gets done more often?

Does that mean it's better to be paid?