this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
422 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
4277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 342345@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You seem ambivalent about the topic. I understand your arguments, but I don't agree with your solution. That doesn't need to bother you. We probably have very different requirements for transportation.

I live in an area where I don't need a car to get where I want to - bike, bus and train are sufficient. And I don't normally need to transport so much that I need a car. And if I need a car I get a rental for a short time.

Sometimes I shake my head a little in disbelief because I find the trend towards more individual transportation within large cars concerning. But then again my lifestyle isn't for everyone and who am I to judge? (But I'm entitled to my own opinion. ;)

[–] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Extremely few Americans live in a place where that is even possible. Few can afford to move to a place like that because they are so rare and desirable. Your comment is not helpful.

[–] 342345@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It wasn't meant to deliver a solution. It's an opinion (as in a piece of my point of view).

It's just not the right way to go in my opinion. (And yes I understand the reasons why people choose what they choose. )

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is also a bugbear for me. Since even in countries with genuinely amazing public transportation (such as Japan), people who live in more rural or remote areas are still up a creek. You might have a bus but you basically have one or two routes per day and if you need to "head into town" at any other time... you need a car.

But there are various youtube channels by rich white people who live in some of the more expensive cities on earth that basically say "fuck the poor" under the guise of better city design. And... don't get me wrong, living in a city with public transportation is amazing and America as a whole REALLY loves unwalkable towns. But there are always going to be situations where private transportation is needed (even if it a few cars that the entire town "shares").

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

some of the more expensive cities on earth that basically say "fuck the poor" under the guise of better city design

You've got that backwards.

Those are great cities to live in which is why living there is expensive. Cause those cities can't accommodate that many people.

The city design isn't the problem. Scarcity of it is.