this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
38 points (93.2% liked)

movies

1779 readers
230 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] golli@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Chani drama at the end is extremely bad writing. It doesn’t stand the test of “would two adult people who talk to each other do that?”. It’s unnecessary too since Chani could be similarily displeased with instrumental use of Fremen but the acting makes it obvious this is about marrying Irulan (who’s the tragic story here, not Chani ffs),

I think it makes more sense in the books (if i remember correctly)

Book spoilersThe movie shortens the timeframe Paul and Jessica spend with the Fremen from multiple years down to months. Probably due to wanting to keep Paul's sister Alia as an unborn child, rather than having to cast a child actor to play this difficult role. And maybe to also keep the stroy a bit simpler, since the second part already has a lot going on.

This also means that Paul's and Chani's first child Leto doesn't exist. Who in the book gets killed by an attack on the sietch (and Alia gets taken hostage by the emperor).

Imagine losing your child and then your husband goes on marrying the daugther of the person in a way responsible for your childs murder.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

All good points that I wouldn't have an issue with as changes to the original if movie script followed through with that premise. To add to your argument - in Villeneuve's version Chani has no relationship with Jessica who's a concubine and could introduce her to space royals / feudalism. They also removed mentions of how brutal Fremen social norms are - there is no mention of wife of Jamis that Paul had to take in (as well as their child, and another child that Jamis got in the same way Paul did).

Even with all this setup it is made clear to the viewer that Paul is aware that Chani will have trouble understanding marrying Irulan. This could be resolved by having a talk beforehand. For some reason Paul decides to deliver these news to Chani in some smug power trip.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, i think in general the change in time frame throws off all kind of things and while keeping Alia as an unborn embryo works quite well, some other parts suffer. I also would have liked to see Jamis wife/children, since that could have given even more emotional impact than the more general mourning sequence we got. But i can also understand that this would have added yet another story line to an already full movie.

Interestingly enough i recently watched the old Dune movie as comparison and was suprised that out of the slightly above 2h run time they spend 1,5h to reach the point where Dune Part I ends.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago

Never looked into it but it looked like Lynch planned for a much longer film and had to cut production short, hence much more exposition up until that point.