this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
465 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59168 readers
2113 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They need to become a private company again. And fire the Douglas team.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nah, since they're in the "too big to fail" category, nationalize them. Achieves the same outcome of removing the shareholders and board, without pouring money into a rich douchebag's pocket

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's a very natural way to identify which industries and companies should be nationalized. If it's too big to fail, it's too important to be privately (or publicly by investors) owned.

[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

I don't know that the second part would succeed. I feel like it'd end up with the same contractor structure, but now the contractors are whoever's company bought the right senators.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why? So they can make the bad decisions in secret?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's a bit of meme that private companies make better decisions because they don't have the silly pressures that the stock market puts on companies. Valve is usually the prime example.

It's not completely wrong, but needs to be more carefully considered. Being private makes it possible to make better decisions due to lack of stock market pressures. Whether companies actually do or not needs to be considered on a case by case basis. There are plenty of private companies that are still run by shitbags.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I know and disgree, imagine Elon Musk being CEO of Valve instead of gaven, the counter example being Twitter, Which Musk is running as a private company. IMO this idea that private companies are better is a giant falsehood and akin to an urban legend.
Arguably one of the most well run companies in the world is Apple which is public, from more personal knowledge, I'd say one of the most well run companies here, is Novo Nordisk which is also public.