Linux

48153 readers

713 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Enterprise Linux on desktop? (rytter.me)

submitted 8 months ago by anders@rytter.me to c/linux@lemmy.ml

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Enterprise Linux on desktop?

Anyone using enterprise Linux on their desktop such as RHEL, Alma, Rocky, CentOS etc.?

I'm curious if it's easy to use for this purpose or if the older packages are a pain.

@linux

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Secunergy@social.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@Shareni Not sure this comparison is correct

Fedora rather corresponds to OpenSUSE Tumbleweed or Debian Testing

Fedora Rawhide is very experimental, OpenSUSE once had a testing version, couldn’t find it now on the download page

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, I learned more about their lifecycles due to this thread.

I think you're correct as far as usability is concerned, but they've got a lot of similarities:

both are released as daily snapshots, that were only auto tested
those snapshots are frozen before an update and tested further
then they're released as a new minor/major version

The comparison really breaks with leap and sel. While fedora is directly upstream of rhel, both sel and leap are downstream from TW, and leap also has sel packages and so it's also downstream from it. But I think my point still sort of stands because it seems like they mainly implemented that to get additional testing for sel packages.

Usability and stability wise, a better comparison would be: fedora:tw -> centos:leap -> rhel:sel