this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
60 points (67.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Downvoting this stuff doesn't make Biden more competent.

There's still time for him to step aside for damn near anyone else so trump doesn't win.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 56 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There really isn't time. Nobody, not Harris, not anyone will be able to raise the money and coordinate a national campaign between now and the election. The time for him to step aside was like two years ago. Harris needed time to establish her own identity as president to take on Trump. If he withrew from the race, he would have to step down as President because he'd be basically admitting he's too feeble. Harris trying to run as VP would have all the negatives of Biden and none of his strengths. And that's assuming ten more candidates don't step up to try to take the nomination from her.

I agree with you that I wish we had a better Democrat because we really cannot afford another Trump term, but Biden is it. Unless he dies, he's the nominee. I hope he finds the strength to win it.

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

His money is Harris’ money, they’re on the same ticket.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 8 months ago

It's not just money. It's getting the name recognition out there, and most people simply don't pay any attention to the VP. Biden might as well pick a total stranger.

Plus, it's about charisma. In general, people have to like the candidate before they'll vote for them, and Kamala is less charismatic than Biden.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The second sentence is why you’re getting downvoted.

Under the constraints of the system we’re forced to use to elect our politicians… there's actually not. And yeah, I hate it too. But if it’s Biden or overt fascism, I pick Biden.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Changing from the incumbent would assure chaos and loss.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Especially since Biden has been polling below 'generic Democrat' in pretty much every poll.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

A generic candidate will always poll higher because they have no specific flaws and every type of voter can project their own ideal platform onto them.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

For either party, they could run an empty suit and easily win this election. Anyone else could beat trump, and anyone else could beat Biden. It's like we're running the literal lowest common denominators.

And the only rational anyone can give for "why" is that it's too late, which is so obviously not true but they just keep repeating it and eventually it will be