Technology

59436 readers

3358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

230

White House urges developers to dump C and C++ (www.infoworld.com)

submitted 8 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

White House urges developers to dump C and C++::Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was always possible to compile+run C# on Linux using the Mono project. Until Microsoft "bought them out" and created .NET Core, a cross platform version of .NET that MS now encourages people to use instead...

Microsoft's new linux compile tools rub me the wrong way slightly, with the telemetry that's opt-in by default.

Mono is still extremely valuable for older .NET Framework apps under WINE though, way easier to setup compared to the official installers from what i've experienced.

No idea how compiled C# compares to C...

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Compiled C# is about half the speed of C/C++

https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/box-plot-summary-charts.html

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it also doesn't have memory leaks lol

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Definitely. I’ve worked professionally in both. They both have a time and place. I’d be fine with moving all the low level stuff to Rust, but transitions don’t happen by decree so C/C++ will be around for the next 100 years too.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

True that, I'm only at the beginning of my programming journey, so I have a very rough understanding of the differences, pros/cons, and best use cases for various languages.