this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
255 points (97.4% liked)

PCGaming

6487 readers
49 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And the damn thing still broke sales records with 18 million copies sold.

Give me a fucking break.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, like it or not, capitalism requires competition to work. I say this as a communist that would happily upend the system if given an option.

But as it is exclusive are the only thing keeping console makers at bay. The last thing we want is one unified box for them to shove their crap out on. There would be zero incentive in making better games than the competitor.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? The pc is basically one big box that thousands of game makers only release their games on, but there's plenty of competition in the indie game scene and the steam marketplace. If anything, it's taken power away from large publishers because a lot of people would rather pay $30 for a passion filled well thought out game than $80 for the latest unoptimized garbage heap. Game makers would still have to compete if there were no console exclusives. In fact they'd have to compete more, because instead of only being able to afford one console and being stuck with whatever games are on it, people would have the option of whatever games they wanted.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think at the moment it's pretty much agreed upon that the best games that are coming out right now are coming from First Party Studios, Sans Microsoft who's having their own fumbling right now.

They are outputting the best games and traditionally always have because there is more at stake in getting those games made. Without quality games being required to sell a piece of hardware, I don't think first-party games would be nearly as good as they are.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

The switch has like two really good exclusives, and the rest are meh. Ps5 has a few good exclusives, but even Sony has started to realize that it's more profitable to release their games on PC as well. Meanwhile PC/cross-platform games have a ridiculous amount of amazing competing titles. For every exclusive that I wished I had a console to play, there's ten or twenty other games that I'd rather play on PC instead. Console exclusives should and likely will die fairly soon, especially now that consoles are basically just PCs, and with handheld like the steam deck making switch irrelevant.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Computer is just a category of device.