this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43908 readers
809 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've eyeballed ~50 mods in my Minetest instal. Without counting stuff like fireflies, bed, and the likes.
The very fact that Minetest needs mods to be playable already shows an issue: it lacks any sort of overarching game design. Mods don't solve this unless the player is expected to know enough game design to tie them into some engaging gameplay. Most don't.
And some people might say "use a pre-made modpack then", but the people recommending Minetest as an alternative to Minecraft don't do this. They don't say "play MineClone2 in Minetest", they say "play Minetest", like the comment that I was replying to.
And even then what I said in the other comment still stands. Compare for example:
The first pic is NodeCore, one of the (IMO) best developed Minetest modpacks. The second one is vanilla Minecraft. The difference in polish is visible; and that difference isn't just visuals, it's in every aspect of the game. Including progression, because even the shittiest Minecraft kitchen sink modpack still relies on vanilla "gluing" its gameplay together, and in Minetest there's nothing like this.
Because of that I do not think that Minetest should be recommended when people ask for a way to play Minecraft without account.
As a more mundane comparison, it's on the same level as OP asking "hey, which brand of soap should I buy?" and someone answering "Just make it at home! First you're going to electrolyse some salt to get sodium hydroxide, then you're going to raise some olives for that nice oil..."
I agree that none of the games in Minetest have anywhere near the level of polish as Minecraft. And as we're comparing a pretty niche game engine built on by hobbyists vs Microsoft, it's very much to be expected. I also agree it shouldn't be recommended as a Minecraft alternative.
But the from the first half of your post I think you misunderstand the point of Minetest. Its not meant to have an overarching game design. It's a game engine. Its designed for people to use to make their own games.
I'm aware that it is just an engine. And the point still stands - OP is asking how to play a specific game in Linux (Minecraft), and gets a reply like "play that engine instead" (Minetest). The reply does not specify which game (Minetest modpack) the replier sees as an alternative, nor addresses the fact that even the closest equivalents (probably MineClone2) are considerably inferior to the game OP is talking about, and thus not really a good alternative.
Please, note that I'm not singling out the person who suggested Minetest - I've seen other posters across other platforms doing the same. Frankly it feels like the people recommending Minetest as an alternative to Minecraft never bothered playing either for more than fifteen minutes.