this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
135 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30547 readers
149 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nintendo says Yuzu played a large role in encouraging piracy of The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 63 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Love how the courts are framing this. "ROMs are illegal software." "Emulators are for playing pirated software."

Fuck you, Nintendo. You made $1.6bil in profits last year. I bet the number of pirated copies of Zelda: TotK barely amount to a fraction of a percent of that.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Love how the courts are framing this. “ROMs are illegal software.” “Emulators are for playing pirated software.”

Ngl I kinda want them to use this logic and see what happens when they try to apply it to Nintendo’s own Virtual Console, which are emulators playing ROMs basically.

Hell, the games you can play in Animal Crossing are literal emulators with ROMs since they found iNES data in the headers.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 10 points 8 months ago

EULA for us not for them.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The courts aren't. Nintendo is.

Emulation has already been litigated to hell and back. It's very clearly legal, including relying on users pulling a blob or two from their hardware for the whole thing to function.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where has pulling proprietary blobs been litigated? I was under the impression it hadn't been.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that would make sense except you missed a key point:

Connectix's development strategy was based upon reverse engineering the PlayStation's BIOS firmware, first by using the unchanged BIOS to develop emulation for the hardware, and then by developing a BIOS of their own using the original firmware as an aid for debugging.

The whole point here is that Connectix used Sony's BIOS to develop their own BIOS. Yuzu is not doing that. They don't have their own BIOS they are providing to their users. They are telling people to use Nintendo's bios, but that they aren't providing it.

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago

To put this another way, Yuzu relies on Nintendo's BIOS to function. Connectix's Game Station did not.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe Nintendo's argument has more to do with dumping the prod.keys than with using dumped "Roms"

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This. This seems to be the argument that Nintendo is hinging on. In order for Yuzu to play the games properly you need a prod.keys file. I guess Nintendo is claiming that the keys in this file are owned by them and it's illegal to have that number much in the same way the number used to represent the C code for decoding DVD copy protection is illegal: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number#Illegal_primes

I am no lawyer but seems tenuous when you can run a program to get the prod.keys from your own console. Especially when that code is legal and exists on GitHub: https://github.com/Decscots/Lockpick_RCM