this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
312 points (97.3% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2702 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 48 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't understand why this wasn't done on day 1 of the invasion.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Really? Any lawyers or something can verify?

Surely if international law applied back then, then it still does? What has changed?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 8 months ago

Laws do change actually and thats a good thing.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Because international law isn’t a real thing, not in any sense that makes it similar to the internal laws of a state.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 12 points 8 months ago

Right so the argument is that back at the start of the invasion, Russia had not done a lot of damage (monetarily speaking) but now it has done so much damage that the frozen assets don't even pay the whole bill, so taking it is akin to taking the assets of someone with a lot of debt.

I guess it kinda makes sense. Still think they should've taken it right at the start though. This war shouldn't have gone on for so long like this.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because if you want everyone to use your banking cartel, stealing people's money as a political ploy tends to scare them away.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Or just don't launch full scale invasions against sovereign countries? Is that bar too high?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait, did the US claim Iraq or Afghanistan their territory?

The US did give lots of assets to those countries to rebuild. Not nearly enough and I would support other countries freezing US assets and giving them to those countries to help rebuild.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

America installed a government that kidnapped little boys to rape them and transformed the entire economy into an opium farm,

Then they left and stole 7 Billion in Afghan assets.

For more info: https://youtu.be/SHcl-3vo2_0?si=8RZQpSodPPscCaDO

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago

Sorry my bad. The answer is they claimed both and still occupy iraq

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Instruction unclear. I proceeded to launch invasions against non sovereign countries

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago

Property rights are kinda a big deal in The West. Plus capital from less savory regimes brings in much needed liquidity in western markets. Ceasing this capital will make it less likely that The West is seen as a safe haven for investment from those kinds of countries. On the long term this might even cause a parallel financial system to arise, which would be very bad news for the US and it’s reserve currency.