The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It shouldn't be a surprise. Cases where the Court did the right thing or refused to look at overturning the right thing. (Only been collecting these for a month or so.)

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-bathrooms-indiana-35c59c4dbe94668592c96e2a27c8d517

https://newrepublic.com/post/179149/supreme-court-samuel-alito-traditional-people-bigots-lgbtq

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-trump-allied-lawyers-over-2020-election-lawsuit-in-michigan/

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-from-3-gop-house-members-over-500-mask-fines/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-02-20/supreme-court-rejects-property-rights-challenge-to-rent-control

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immigration-texas-razor-wire-9daef6bd316211b6633ece718e505187

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/u-s-supreme-court-wont-take-up-wa-capital-gains-tax-challenge/

Imagine how much better we'd be doing with Clarence impeached.