this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
39 points (85.5% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14205 readers
3 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sabbah@lemmy.world
AradFort@lemmy.world
rikudou@lemmings.world
Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
Rikudou_Sage@lemmy.world
39
How is decentralized social media more private if all the data is public and shared? (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by Aurelius@lemmy.world to c/explainlikeimfive@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s not, never was, and never claimed to be.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Except, I guess, in that it can be pseudonymous. It's possible somebody knows who I am in real life, but it's also possible they don't (given the way I always connect). You may or may not count that under your definition of "private".

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Security through obscurity is not real security.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's not security through obscurity. That would be if I reversed all my posts front-to-back without telling you, or something. Anonymity and pseudonymity are totally legit things with a long and continuing history.