this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
819 points (98.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54424 readers
392 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I’m suspicious of the idea that women respond favorably to those notices.

“You wouldn’t download a car…”
Women: Gee, officer, that’s a good point.

Riiiiiiight…

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 14 points 8 months ago

Yeah, proper cohort attribution seems to be a little lacking by this data analyst. I'd say gender bias has already occured before your specific sample point... bro

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Lol piracy intentions :P

now we need a follow up study comparing gender differences between who gets caught more.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago

"You wouldn't download a house."

Fuck you, I would if I could.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago
[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They work on my mother, but she has the kind of faith in the system I honestly envy. It seems like a much more tranquil existence.

This is the same woman who thinks the Judge Rotenburg center must not be that bad, because otherwise it would have already been closed down. She just...can't imagine a regulatory failure that big actually happening.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"what's the Judge Rotenburg Center?" looks it up "Jesus"

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't even finish reading the Wiki article

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Ok, I had to stop reading at the shock collars for mentally disabled kids. That's some introduction paragraph.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

According to the article, these were threatening messages (one about potential viruses, another about legal penalties). It fits gender stereotypes perfectly for women to seek to mitigate risks while seek someone to hold their beer.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

So the result of the study is “it’s pretty easy to scare women into submission”? Sounds like a great use of their time and resources. 🤮