this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
301 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59999 readers
2374 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China's space program::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 111 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 59 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The goal was optics. Kennedy didn't know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

The "for all mankind" angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

Don't get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn't have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The dick measuring is what I was referring to by "optics".

[–] redfox@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

[–] redfox@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

Ha, I was actually taking about the space program, but same for the invasion. Although, I feel like more people have come forward about the invasion being BS than early space program stuff.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I don't think anyone has definitely proven that George W Bush and Colin Powell KNEW that the WMD claims in Iraq were bullshit when they were presenting them as the primary justification for the war.

It's just the nature of the beast.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Nonsense, surely their shortsightedness will pay off in the long run!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Don't worry, I do.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The government has funded SpaceX, not musk.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, it's not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA's entire budget?

Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it's just that we couldn't be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn't managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They certainly don't have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what's best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.