this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
368 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did I even mention what stayed I was at in this thread?

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, but I know what state I'm in. You're not in Alaska or Texas or you wouldn't be making these fantastic claims, so by process of elimination, you do not live in a larger state than I.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then my next question would be why you think a states size has anything to do with getting good 5g coverage and speeds?

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, why would I engage with that sort of disingenuous nonsense. We're talking about cell coverage. Area matters. Period. Full statewide 5G coverage may be possible in a tiny state, but it starts to get bad and then abysmal as states become larger and are mostly rural.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

Why do you possibly think that a states size has anything to do with where they place cell towers? Cities barely even care about what state they sit in. Hell, Kansas city is in two states. Cell towers are just put in populated areas. Not populated states.