I actually did seriously consider doing that but I decided against it. Beehaw has almost everything that a social platform needs and I'd rather help it grow than try to create something new.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beehaw has almost everything that a social platform needs

What do you think is missing?

[–] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Measures to keep it from becoming another reddit far down the road. I'd love if this could be my forever home here. 15 years ago when reddit was started it had a similar vibe to here and I'm sure few people thought it would turn into the cesspool it is today. If we could put preempive measures in place to avoid that early on this could be something beautiful.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the desire of the admins of Beehaw to not make this a part or full time job will go a long way. But the federated nature of Lemmy can be problematic in a way that I'm not sure has any good answers.

[–] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the federated nature of Lemmy can be problematic in a way that I’m not sure has any good answers.

How so?

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The nature of federated protocols gives the instances with the largest popularity more influence over the protocol. It's also not great for privacy or the ability of message senders remove to prior messages sent to other nodes in the network. There are problems for smaller instances being DDOS'd by simply having a popular account on another instance drawing attention to a message or account on the smaller instance either benignly or maliciously. Among other concerns.

[–] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks!