this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
173 points (90.2% liked)

World News

39347 readers
2709 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is such a dumb myth. The problem is that we refuse to embrace green energy, not that there's too many people.

If the oil lobby didn't block all progress this would have been solved long ago.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Energy isn't our only limited resource.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A few top% people in the world (mostly western countries) are responsible for the majority of emissions

We throw away a billion more times food than we really consume too. And we just dump everything we don't like into the ocean

Everything is a distribution problem, not an availability problem.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the amount of population doesn't match the way we live. You could create any ideal society and say that overpopulation isn't the issue, or create an underpopulated society and say the way we live isn't the issue.

You're saying "we just need to fix the biggest issues of our society in in order for overpopulation to be a non-issue, easy!"

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm saying we would screw up the earth even if we literally had 1/2 the people. By just dumping even more in the ocean and being even less responsible.

We have an absolute abundance of resources and energy and somehow (oil lobby) we manage to be so inefficient that we will never improve that efficiency unless absolutely needed.

If we had half the humans we would waste twice as much.