this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
133 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32290 readers
594 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MikeTheComrade@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's really sad how duped American citizens are here. They truly believe that when changing their bio pics to a Ukraine Flag that they're doing something. They believe their government has the best interest of Ukraine while what they're actually supporting is their government using Ukrainian bodies to weaken an adversary under the guise of defense. No one learned anything after Iraq, it was mere MONTHS ago that liberals were giving BUSH praise! They don't care about Abu Ghraib or what happened in Guantanamo Bay. A lot of people here are in for a rough awakening.

[–] JillyB@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused. Do you think Russia taking Ukraine by force is what's best for Ukraine? Do you think their people are volunteering to fight because they just don't know what's best for them? Even if Ukrainians wanted to maintain independence out of some misguided patriotism, isn't it their right as a sovereign nation to decide that?

From the US perspective, Ukraine wanted to join NATO, aligning themselves with us. Then Russia invaded. If the US didn't support Ukraine, the world would know they can prevent a weaker country from joining NATO by invading. After Iraq and Afghanistan, there's no desire to send US troops but we can provide weapons and intelligence.

[–] MikeTheComrade@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Weapons, intelligence and Ukrainian bodies are an extremely cheap deal to weaken an adversary, don't you think?

When it comes to wanting oil though, US and Iraqi bodies aren't so important. As long as you can dupe your own citizens into believing there's WMD's, it doesn't matter.

And of course Ukraine knows what's best for them. That's why they keep asking for a roadmap to NATO but the US is like "Nah" - https://www.ft.com/content/c37ed22d-e0e4-4b03-972e-c56af8a36d2e

So of course they're left to negotiate. Again, the US Government doesn't care but their citizens think they do.

The US is against peace if it doesn't get more money to the military–industrial complex or if it doesn't weaken an adversary, like in this case.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

The US is against 'any' attempt by any country to use its resources for its own purposes. America behaves like any other imperial power has, throughout history. If Russia or China had the power the US currently does, they'd be doing the same thing. It's why 'Empire' as a concept can coexist just as easily with 'democracy' as a framework as it does in autocracies. Because every State out there wants to maximize it's share of power in the world. And this includes the US. That's why fundamentally things don't change all that much, regardless of who gets into power.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

By volunteered to fight you mean being abducted on the street, beaten, and sent to die?

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people of Ukraine have told the world what their best interest is: removing Russian soldiers from their land, by force if necessary.

The US is only interested in Ukraine when their goals align. Everyone knows this, including most Americans and most Ukrainians.

However, it turns out that US and Ukrainian goals do, in fact, align. The US isn't "using" Ukraine any more than Ukraine is "using" the US. They are openly cooperating to achieve a common interest.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Ukrainian people are being kidnapped off the street and sent to die by the regime US installed in Ukraine after overthrowing a democratically elected government. Most Ukrainians don't want to have a war and have their lives destroyed. The only people who want this war are ghouls living in the west who aren't personally affected by it.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tankies can always be counted on to project the worst in themselves.

There are hundreds of thousands of Russians in Georgia and Kazakhstan who can explain which side is kidnapping young men off the street and sending them to die for a war they care nothing about. Meanwhile, opinion polls of Ukrainians consistently show that an overwhelming majority want to continue the war until Russians are defeated.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have plenty of video evidence of this happening in Ukraine, but whatever you say my little dronie. And yeah, opinion polls mean so much in a country that's now effectively a military dictatorship.

[–] JasBC@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

....nice, your stance must mean Russian-ones meant shite before the war even began then right?

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

If you don't believe in opinion polls, then your claim that most Ukrainians are against the war is based on nothing but the voices in your head.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Americans are subject to the best propaganda machine that money can buy, and people running the regime are certainly getting their money's worth.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

"Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media." - Noam Chomsky