this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
117 points (92.7% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1049 readers
1 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [!linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works](/c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works)


Serious Linguistics community: !linguistics@mander.xyz


Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

spoileralt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled "I don't believe in prescriptivism" and "'Literally' cannot mean 'figuratively'". A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger's owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You know how I said language doesn't work properly without context? You don't have to ask for context when someone tells you something. I struggle to think of a situation where it isn't obvious in the moment whether someone means "literally" literally or figuratively. For example, "I'm literally suffocating." Did you actually think about the reality of a situation where someone tells you this? You can just look at a person and know whether they're struggling to breathe.

I admit that if someone sends a text that reads "I'm literally suffocating" without any context, then that's not very useful, but that just works further to my point that context matters.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I admit that if someone sends a text that reads “I’m literally suffocating” without any context

Exactly.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but that just works further to my point that context matters.

Have some reading glasses 👓

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I never denied that context matters, my point is that few words are that ambiguous without context.