Linux

48003 readers

1338 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Ubuntu trying to install snap AND Firefox even though I have removed them a year back (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by xavier666@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just tried to upgrade Ubuntu and I suddenly see that new packages want to be installed; snapd and firefox. I don't need Firefox because I'm already using Firefox-ESR as a deb and I certainly don't need snaps.

Why is Ubuntu doing this? I get it you like snaps but I don't, so don't try to force install it. I had to use apt-mark hold to block the install of snapd and firefox. This is also not an isolated incident. I just checked Reddit and someone made a thread 8 hours back regarding the same issue.

This thing is giving me Microsoft vibes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone know if Kubuntu does the same with snaps?

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every *buntu has been forced to comply, they took longer but now they are all aligned in this "Snap-it-all, don't support Flatpak" approach.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Define "forced to comply". I understand Canonical can do anything with Ubuntu, which is why this random forced snap install happened.

But do they have similar authority over the rest of the bunch?

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

As per this article, it seems like Canonical finally had to specifically enforce it on the remixes, and required them to comply with the "new rules".

[–] squidzorz@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It sounds like that's just part of the game if you want to be considered "official".

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah too bad... I liked KDE.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

KDE neon is your place. Or Debian with KDE, or Fedora KDE, or Arch with KDE...

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't know about them, thank you for the heads-up.

[–] Bjoern_Tantau@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your choice of desktop environment is totally independent from your choice of distribution. You can always change it to what you prefer.

I bet you could even run KDE Neon (KDE's own distribution) with Gnome if you wanted to.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, always something new to discover. I didn't know KDE had their own distribution! I'll check that out. Cheers.